Patient 1 – Case #1356 – Breast Implants
Before
After
This breast augment was performed by Cincinnati Plastic Surgery at University Pointe Surgical Hospital in Westchester, Ohio. Saline implants 350 cc’s placed under muscle.
Individual results may vary.
Click here to contact Kurtis Martin and set up a consultation.
Patient 2 – Case #1357 – Breast Implants
Before
After
Breast Augment using 350 cc saline implants with periareolar incision.
Individual results may vary.
Click here to contact Kurtis Martin and set up a consultation.
Patient 3 – Case #1358 – Breast Implants
Before
After
Saline implants 425 cc’s under muscle peri areolar approach.
Individual results may vary.
Click here to contact Kurtis Martin and set up a consultation.
Patient 4 – Case #1359 – Breast Implants
Before
After
Breast Augment using 350 cc saline implants with periareolar incision.
Individual results may vary.
Click here to contact Kurtis Martin and set up a consultation.
Patient 5 – Case #1360 – Breast Implants
Before
After
Saline implants 425 cc’s under muscle using an incision in the nipple.
Individual results may vary.
Click here to contact Kurtis Martin and set up a consultation.
Patient 6 – Case #1361 – Breast Implants
Before
After
Saline implants 375 cc’s under muscle via a peri areolar approach. The scars under the breast are from a reverse tummy tuck.
Individual results may vary.
Click here to contact Kurtis Martin and set up a consultation.
Patient 7 – Case #1362 – Breast Implants
Before
After
Saline implants 325 cc’s under muscle peri areolar approach.
Individual results may vary.
Click here to contact Kurtis Martin and set up a consultation.
Patient 8 – Case #1363 – Breast Implants
Before
After
Periareolar incision for breast augmentation in an African American patient.
Individual results may vary.
Click here to contact Kurtis Martin and set up a consultation.
Patient 9 – Case #1364 – Breast Implants
Before
After
This young female desired breast enlargement to a C cup. She was noted to have some minor ptosis (drooping) with large areolas and right breast wider than left. A 350 cc moderate profile smooth wall saline implant was placed under the muscle via a periareolar incision. Note the improved symmetry and cleavage. This patient may require a mastopexy in the future if her breasts continue to sag.
Individual results may vary.
Click here to contact Kurtis Martin and set up a consultation.
Patient 10 – Case #1365 – Breast Implants
Before
After
A 425 cc smooth wall moderate profile saline implant was placed under the muscle via a periareolar incision to achieve a large C cup. Notice the lack of visible rippling or wrinkling even with a saline implant. Placing an implant under the muscle ensures the least possible chance of visible wrinkling/rippling especially in the upper part of the breast.
Individual results may vary.
Click here to contact Kurtis Martin and set up a consultation.
Patient 11 – Case #1366 – Breast Implants
Before
After
This breast augment (enlargement) was performed by Cincinnati Plastic Surgery at University Pointe Surgical Hospital in West Chester, Ohio using 375 cc saline implants under the muscle.
Individual results may vary.
Click here to contact Kurtis Martin and set up a consultation.
Patient 12 – Case #1367 – Breast Implants
Before
After
This young female desired breast enlargement to a C cup. She had saline 425 cc implants placed behind the muscle via a periareolar incision. The incisions will continue to fade over the next 6 months.
Individual results may vary.
Click here to contact Kurtis Martin and set up a consultation.
Patient 13 – Case #1881 – Breast Implants
Before
After
Bariatric patient with an augmentation mammoplasty and breast lift. 397 cc Natrelle silicone gel implants were placed under the muscle.
Individual results may vary.
Click here to contact Kurtis Martin and set up a consultation.
Patient 14 – Case #1883 – Breast Implants
Before
After
Bariatric patient with an augmentation mammoplasty and breast lift. 450 cc Mentor silicone gel implants were placed under the muscle.
Individual results may vary.
Click here to contact Kurtis Martin and set up a consultation.
Patient 15 – Case #1925 – Breast Implants
Before
After
48 year old gastric bypass patient with very ptotic, small breasts. She underwent a full mastopexy (breast lift) with sub muscular placement of Mentor adjustable saline implants. These were gradually inflated to 420 cc’s on the left and 400 cc’s on the right. This approach minimizes the risk of tissue breakdown and allows for better balancing of asymmetric breasts.
Individual results may vary.
Click here to contact Kurtis Martin and set up a consultation.
Patient 16 – Case #1935 – Breast Implants
Before
After
34 year old with breast ptosis and micromastia (small size) who desired a better appearing breast. She underwent a full mastopexy (breast lift) with submuscular placement of Mentor adjustable saline implants. These were gradually inflated to a maximum of 530 cc’s of saline. The ports are eventually removed as a minor procedure. This approach diminishes the chance of tissue breakdown which can be associated with some combination procedures.
Individual results may vary.
Click here to contact Kurtis Martin and set up a consultation.